Selected work

CROX Framework

Find the drop.
Explain the breakdown.

A five-stage mixed-methods framework for connecting behavioral evidence with customer experience–and choosing an action the evidence can support.

Read the research paper
Organization
Alibaba Travels
Period
2022–2024
My responsibility
Chief Experience Officer · Interim CPO during transitions

Behavioral evidence

Where does
the journey drop?

Experience evidence

Why does
the breakdown happen?

One segment. One defined journey.

Integrate the evidence before acting.
The challenge

A funnel drop is a location,
not an explanation.

Analytics can show where people stop. Interviews, surveys, support evidence, and service measures can explain the confusion, expectation, context, or operational problem behind that behavior. Reviewed separately, each leaves the decision incomplete.

CROX grew from that practical gap. Its unit of analysis is a defined customer segment moving through a defined journey, so behavioral and experience evidence describe the same population, scope, and period.

The CROX method

  1. 01

    Prepare

    Define the product, journey, segment, period, and outcome. Align the evidence and check data quality.

  2. 02

    Locate

    Find a material conversion drop against a predefined threshold–and verify that the instrumentation is credible.

  3. 03

    Explain

    Use qualitative, service, and operational evidence to investigate why the pattern occurs and map themes to the journey.

  4. 04

    Classify

    Choose among a fix or improvement, a new idea with a hypothesis, or further research when the cause is unclear.

  5. 05

    Evaluate

    Set metrics and guardrails before implementation, then match the strength of the outcome claim to the evaluation design.

My contribution

Turn a working practice
into a repeatable method.

As CXO, I led end-to-end customer experience strategy and the company-level NPS program. I formalized CROX from a collaborative practice spanning product design, research, analytics, and experimentation.

During leadership transitions, I also served as interim CPO, connecting the diagnosis to roadmap priorities, OKRs, and product-manager allocation. The framework’s purpose was not to prescribe a feature; it was to make the next defensible decision clearer.

Each cycle ended with an evidence-backed action category, an owner, a plausible mechanism, success measures, guardrails, and an evaluation plan defined before implementation.

The case

One visible drop.
Several underlying causes.

A retrospective 2022 tour-package case began with substantial abandonment from the product-detail page onward. The team examined 782 navigation and contact records, reviewed the later purchase behavior of 80 users, and completed 20 telephone interviews.

The interviews showed that the late-stage drop was carrying multiple problems at once: incomplete hotel information, questions during passenger-data entry, fragile package comparison, constrained inventory, stale or changing prices, and destination-service issues.

Destination surveys and Outbound Tours NPS added the end-to-end experience. They helped distinguish interface problems from hotel, transfer, tour-leader, and destination-operator issues that a funnel alone could not reveal.

782 navigation and contact records
80 users in the purchase-history review
20 in-depth customer interviews
What changed

Measure the trajectory.
Limit the claim.

The wording of the result should never be stronger than the evaluation behind it.

Outbound Tours NPS moved from −35 to −21 during the initial 2022 period, a descriptive 14-point increase, before returning to −32 by September. That spring improvement did not hold, which is exactly why CROX keeps measurement alive after an intervention.

Later operational monitoring from November 2023 to May 2024 showed a materially different state: NPS was positive in five of seven reporting periods and peaked at approximately +13.4. The spread from the lowest 2022 value to that later peak was 48.4 NPS points.

The later series was routine operational analysis, not a controlled evaluation. It cannot isolate CROX from subsequent product, supplier, pricing, service, or market changes. The shift is substantial and descriptive–not a causal estimate of the framework’s effect.

The retrospective archive does not contain the exposure allocation, denominators, variant definitions, uncertainty estimates, or final controlled-test reports needed to claim a conversion effect. CROX explicitly treats a controlled experiment as one evaluation option–not a label for any observed before-and-after change.

Continue exploring Fractured Light Studios